«Որևէ երկիր մտնող ազգի բանակն այդ երկրի համար թշնամի է դառնում». Արբակ Խաչատրյանը՝ ղազախական զարգացումների մասին

The recent developments in Kazakhstan are considered by political analyst Arbak Khachatryan to be directly comparable to the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan about a year ago. In a conversation with Aravot, referring to the Kazakh developments, Arbak Khachatryan said that it was obvious at that time that the so-called “Afghan processes” would continue and that the most probable development was in the Central Asian direction against Russia, about which he said in his interviews.

And the joy that accompanied the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan was still incomprehensible to him at that time, because, among other factors, the US military in Afghanistan also resisted terrorist organizations and organizations, preventing their spread and thus preventing a number of countries from getting that headache.

He has been and remains of the opinion that the processes following the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan will be such that the Syrian issue will seem like a “small flower” against their background. Our interlocutor, by the way, does not consider the developments in Kazakhstan to be a purely social revolt, which turns into a political problem. He thinks that the Muslim religious structures are trying to take advantage of the situation and implement their clear program of unification in different directions. At the moment, the hotspot is Kazakhstan, and regardless of whether any country accepts these organizations or not, they will try to implement their plans.

Something that does not exist in the Christian world because there is no ideology of unity at the core of Christianity. In any case, in his opinion, the policy of looting carried out by the former President of Kazakhstan and his entourage, which always poses the greatest danger to the countries, is quite dominant in these developments.

“The government that does not return the robbery, does not stop the robbery, will one day explode on itself. The one who came to power with a yellow car and his puppies today are taking millions from the country as a result of the government,” our interlocutor said, adding that such a policy of the dictatorial authorities destroys the given states. In Kazakhstan, our interlocutor draws attention to the fact that Kazakhstan was the most pro-Western of the post-Soviet countries, after the Baltic states. Referring to the decision to send the CSTO Armed Forces to Kazakhstan, our interlocutor draws attention to the fact that the decision was made in accordance with Article 4 of the CSTO Treaty, which describes the case of aggression against a member state and without any evidence of foreign aggression against Kazakhstan, CSTO made such a decision.

The negative reaction of Washington already exists and in this case, according to Arbak Khachatryan, the logical step is that the West will impose sanctions on the CSTO member states for illegal action, which will be deadly for both Russia and, moreover, other CSTO member states. As a result, according to our interlocutor, Russia, again going to the ultimatum, goes to the worst-case scenario – a large-scale war or, more dangerously, the development of an atomic bomb. He notes that this situation, when Russia is surrounded by NATO troops and the country’s borders are “on fire,” is the “achievement” of Russia’s wrong policy.

By appointing its vassals as leaders in the post-Soviet states, who plundered those countries, creating an unstable field, led to such scenarios. According to our interlocutor, on the other hand, no matter how obvious the fact of terrorism is, the army of the nation that enters the country becomes an enemy for that country. He notes that in the course of history, there has not been a case when the troops of another country entered another state and benefited, except for Alexander I, the repetition of which is ruled out in this case.

Nelly GRIGORYAN